Logical fallacies handout pdf

Logical Fallacies . Directions: For each logical fallacy, describe what is wrong with each example. Be specific and describe the problems in terms of the premise (first part), the middle term (establishes relationship or connection), or the conclusion (last part). Use specific language from the example in your descriptions. fallacies. They ignore that the material implication lacks an intrinsic connection between antecedent and consequent. This is unlike a determinative relation (see Handout 4, the paradoxes of the material implication). (3) Commutation of 1Conditionals: φ ⊃ ψ ⊦ ψ ⊃ φ Examples. (a) 'If thought experiments work, we can trust our Each of these fallacies is characterized by the illegitimate use of a logical operator in order to distract the reader from the apparent falsity of a certain proposition. False Dilemma Definition: A limited number of options (usually two) is given, while in reality there are more options. A false dilemma is an illegitimate use of the "or" operator. Attacking the Opponent's Character- Often called an ad hominem attack, this fallacy is sometimes used in an attempt to direct attention away from the logical of a case—usually a strong case-by evoking a negative emotional response to the person making the case. The opposite fallacy (pro hominem) which also is common, Please take notes on the following lecture. You will be presented with an abundance of information and examples on fallacies. There will be ten total fallacies in this lesson. For each fallacy: Write the name of the fallacy and underline it. Write the definition of the fallacy Write the "mathematical" example. Choose one more example (there will be several) and write it. Handout: Argument Fallacies Ad Hominem (literally "argument to the man"): attacking a person's character instead of the content of that person's argument. Not simply name-calling, this argument suggests that the argument is flawed because of its source. For example, David Horowitz as quoted in the Daily Definition: Fallaciesare arguments that sound convincing but are essentially flawed; they usually stem from careless thinking, or more often, from an attempt to persuade through non-logical means. 4 These are specific patterns of deceptively convincing but false reasoning, called fallacies. Point out logical fallacies to remove your opponents' arguments from the round. If it violates a rule of logic, it can't be considered in a debate. 1) State the name of the fallacy your opponents are using. The opposition points out that the voters supported gun control by a wide margin in last Additionally, students must identify the correct logical fallacy based on the definition of each fallacy's typical construction. This quiz can be deployed at the end of this unit or at the completion of this module. (Time estimate: 15 min) Quiz: Word format: Unit 1 Quiz -- private instructor-only file. Hide. practice to construct a sound and credible argument, and to recognize areas where there may be holes in your logic. One way to strengthen your argument is to recognize Logical Fallacies, or common errors in reasoning that will weaken the logic of your argument. These are often accompanied by lack of reasoning to support evidence. Here are some Logical Fallacies Handout copy.pdf - Logical Fallacies Note SchoolUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas Course TitleSOC 202 Uploaded ByGrandPigeon56 Pages3 This previewshows page 1 - 2out of 3pages. Students who viewed t